Donald Trump has never been one to respect boundaries, but his latest move surpasses even his most blatant past transgressions. Delivering a politically charged speech at the Department of Justice (DOJ), Trump did more than just toe the line between the executive branch and the judiciary—he obliterated it. Traditionally, U.S. presidents have understood the necessity of keeping the DOJ free from political influence. Trump, however, not only waded into that space but did so with an agenda that was as alarming as it was revealing. The Unprecedented Venue for a Partisan Speech The DOJ is meant to function independently, an institution that serves justice rather than political interests. That’s why presidents have historically refrained from exerting influence over its prosecutors. Trump, however, made it clear that his priorities lie not with enforcing the law impartially, but with targeting his enemies—be they political opponents, media networks, or specific individuals who have criticize...
Introduction A second Donald Trump presidency would likely bring an “America First” approach back to U.S. foreign policy. Trump’s first term was marked by unconventional decisions that disrupted alliances and challenged adversaries. This analysis examines how a Trump 2.0 administration might affect global stability and conflict risks. It considers Trump’s past foreign policy moves, his relationships with key world leaders, his stance on international institutions, and major geopolitical flashpoints (from Russia-Ukraine to China-Taiwan and the Middle East ). Expert opinions and historical parallels are also highlighted to gauge whether a renewed Trump doctrine would escalate tensions or possibly de-escalate certain conflicts. Trump’s Past Foreign Policy: Decisions and Consequences Trump’s 2017–2021 term saw dramatic shifts in U.S. foreign policy. Key decisions and their consequences included: Withdrawal from International Agreements: Trump pulled the U.S. out of multilateral ac...